Who is Most At-Risk of Being Hazed?

All students involved in high school organizations are at risk of being subjected to hazing.

No high school group was completely free of hazing.

Adults' experiences and attitudes greatly influence students' involvement in hazing. Students who knew an adult who was hazed were more likely to be hazed. In the teenage years, being accepted is the central developmental task. This drive for conformity creates fertile ground for hazing, so that even minor adult encouragement of this behavior can be more powerful than adults realize because it plays upon teenagers' incredibly strong drive to belong.

Students' attitudes reflect their likelihood of being hazed. Students who said they considered hazing socially acceptable were significantly more frequently involved in all forms of hazing. Not surprisingly, students who thought humiliating hazing was good were more often subjected to humiliation; students who thought dangerous hazing was good were more apt to engage in dangerous hazing.

Students with a lower grade point average (GPA) were significantly more likely to be involved with all forms of hazing than those with a higher GPA.

For many students, hazing starts young.

Six percent of all students responding to the survey indicated they were hazed before they were teenagers. One quarter of the students who reported being hazed in high school (24.3%) said they were hazed before they were teenagers.

Age Students Were First Hazed

Age	%
9	10
10-12	15
13-15	61
16-18	15

For many students hazing becomes a way of life more than a rite of passage. As found in the research on hazing in collegiate athletics (Alfred University, 1999, p. 8), 42 percent of the athletes hazed in college were also hazed in high school and 5 percent said they were hazed in middle school. Comparing high school athletes to college athletes shows the level of dangerous hazing persists at about the same levels (23% in high school, 21% in college), whereas substance abuse and humiliation increase substantially in college (from 22% to 51% and from 45% to 65% respectively).

Percent of Athletes Subjected to Hazing, High School cf. College

Boys were subjected to more hazing behaviors than girls and were significantly more involved in dangerous hazing. Among boys, 48 percent were subjected to humiliating hazing; 24 percent said they were involved in substance abuse; and 27 percent participated in dangerous hazing. Still, girls were consistently involved in all forms of hazing at very high levels: humiliating hazing 39 percent; substance abuse 18 percent; and dangerous hazing 17 percent.

Every high school organization, except newspaper and yearbook staffs, had significantly high levels of hazing.

Sports, gangs, music, art, and theater groups were significantly high in every form of hazing.
Church groups were significantly high in all forms, but particularly dangerous hazing.
Cheerleading and vocational groups were significantly high in humiliation and substance abuse.
Fraternities and sororities were significantly high in all three categories of hazing behaviors.
Social groups were significantly high in humiliating and dangerous hazing.
Political groups were significantly high in substance abuse.
Scholastic groups were significantly high in dangerous hazing.

An unanticipated finding was that nearly half of the students hazed for church groups were expected to engage in illegal activities.

Students Significantly More Likely to Experience Various Forms of Hazing (2)

	Humiliating Hazing	Substance Abuse Hazing	Dangerous Hazing
Grade Point Ave:	Lower	Lower	Lower
Gender:			Male
Believe:	Humiliation is good		Danger is good
Know adult who was hazed:	Yes	Yes	Yes
Think hazing is socially acceptable:	Yes	Yes	Yes
Were hazed for:	Sport Peer group or gang Music, Art, or Theatre Cheerleading Squad Church Group Fraternity/Sorority Social Organization Vocational Group	Peer group or gang Sport Cheerleading Squad Music, Art, or Theatre Vocational Group Fraternity/Sorority Political Group Church Group	Peer group or gang Sport Church Group Music, Art, or Theatre Fraternity/Sorority Social Organization Scholastic Group

(2) Significance based on logistic regression X2 at <0.01.